Anglian Water Services Limited
Customer named in the DNOs' registers
In UKPN's October 2026 and NGED's August 2026 editions
The registers spell this customer’s name more than one way: “Anglian Water Services Limited” (6 sites), “Anglian water services ltd” (4 sites) and “Anglian Water Services” (2 sites).
Capacity by DNO
Capacity by technology
| Technology | Sites | Capacity | Connected | Accepted to connect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gas and other fossil | 7 | 13.8 MW | 13.8 MW | – |
| Bioenergy and waste | 1 | 11.9 MW | 11.9 MW | – |
| Other or not stated | 2 | 4.7 MW | 4.7 MW | – |
| Solar | 2 | 2.2 MW | 2.2 MW | – |
Each site is grouped by its first energy source, as the register names it.
Sites
Each site under this name in the DNOs' latest editions, the largest first.
Site, company and substation names are shown as they appear in the registers, including capitalisation.
| Site | DNO | Grid supply point | Technology | Status | MW |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Great billing sewage treatment works | NGED | Grendon 132Kv S Stn | Bioenergy and waste | Connected | 11.9 |
| Southend STW | UKPN | Rayleigh | Gas and other fossil | Connected | 3.2 |
| Sewage works washingborough road canwick | NGED | West Burton 132Kv S Stn | Other or not stated | Connected | 3.01 |
| Flag Fen Sewage Treatment Works | UKPN | Walpole | Gas and other fossil | Connected | 2.5 |
| Lowestoft WWTC | UKPN | Norwich | Gas and other fossil | Connected | 2.3 |
| Whitlingham Sewage Works | UKPN | Norwich | Gas and other fossil | Connected | 1.75 |
| Ingoldmills sewage works | NGED | Bicker Fen 132Kv S Stn | Other or not stated | Connected | 1.7 |
| FDG B-30 Kirby Bedon Road | UKPN | Norwich | Gas and other fossil | Connected | 1.5 |
| Water treatment work, spalding road, su | NGED | Walpole 132Kv S Stn | Gas and other fossil | Connected | 1.33 |
| Basildon STW | UKPN | Rayleigh | Gas and other fossil | Connected | 1.2 |
| Flag Fen Sewage Treatment Works | UKPN | Walpole | Solar | Connected | 1.2 |
| Heigham Water Treatment Works | UKPN | Norwich | Solar | Connected | 1 |
Grid supply points
Each grid supply point its sites are at, with the capacity of its own sites there.
| Grid supply point | DNO | Sites | Connected | Accepted to connect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grendon 132Kv S Stn | NGED | 1 | 11.9 MW | – |
| Norwich | UKPN | 4 | 6.6 MW | – |
| Rayleigh | UKPN | 2 | 4.4 MW | – |
| Walpole | UKPN | 2 | 3.7 MW | – |
| West Burton 132Kv S Stn | NGED | 1 | 3 MW | – |
| Bicker Fen 132Kv S Stn | NGED | 1 | 1.7 MW | – |
| Walpole 132Kv S Stn | NGED | 1 | 1.3 MW | – |
What changed recently
Changes to its sites found in both of two consecutive monthly editions of their DNO's register, the latest first.
UKPN, September 2026 edition to October 2026 edition, for this customer's sites: 6 sites matched. 4 sites couldn't be matched between the two editions, because their details changed or they appear in only one.
NGED: QueueWatch holds one edition of its register so far, the August 2026 edition, so there is nothing to compare yet.
No change to the status, capacity, technology or customer of its sites in the editions QueueWatch holds.
Price what a delay would do to your project
QueueWatch reports what changed in the DNOs' published connection registers. It doesn't tell you what to do about it. That's what QueueQuant is for.
Give QueueQuant a site and it compares every way you could power it, on the grid or off it: waiting for the firm date, taking a non-firm offer, building a private wire or going off-grid, across every combination of contracted capacity, generation and battery. That’s millions of possible plans, each tested against thousands of possible futures for delay, curtailment and price. It returns the one plan that holds up best, even when that plan is not to build.
Get the plan that holds up best for your site, and where that answer flips.
What you get from QueueQuant
- The route to power that wins
- How to size every asset on the site
- The level of delay or curtailment at which that answer flips
- Whether the project is worth building at all
- How bad the worst outcomes get, at the risk level you choose