QueueWatchby QueueQuant Price my project Get the plan that holds up best for your site, and where that answer flips.
Distribution / Sites / Customer

OPDE UK Limited

Customer named in the DNOs' registers

In UKPN's October 2026, NGED's August 2026, SSEN's September 2026 and ENWL's September 2026 editions

The registers spell this customer’s name more than one way: “OPDE UK Limited” (8 sites), “OPDE UK LTD” (4 sites), “OPDE UK LIMITED” (2 sites), “OPDE UK LTS” (1 site) and “Opde uk limited” (1 site).

16sites of 1 MW and over
618 MWcapacity
9 MWconnected (1 sites)
609 MWaccepted to connect (15 sites)

Capacity by DNO

DNOEditionSitesCapacityConnectedAccepted to connect
UKPNOctober 2026 edition8217 MW9 MW208 MW
NGEDAugust 2026 edition154 MW–54 MW
SSENSeptember 2026 edition6308 MW–308 MW
ENWLSeptember 2026 edition140 MW–40 MW

Capacity by technology

TechnologySitesCapacityConnectedAccepted to connect
Solar10304 MW9 MW295 MW
Storage4207 MW–207 MW
Wind154 MW–54 MW
Other or not stated152.7 MW–52.7 MW

Each site is grouped by its first energy source, as the register names it.

Sites

Each site under this name in the DNOs' latest editions, the largest first.

Site, company and substation names are shown as they appear in the registers, including capitalisation.

SiteDNOGrid supply pointTechnologyStatusMW
Padwick farmNGEDCellarhead 132KvWindAccepted to connect54
50MWSSENBRORAOther or not statedAccepted to connect52.68
BALGONIE FARM 50MW BATTERYSSENABERNETHYStorageAccepted to connect52.68
BLINDWELLS FARMSSENARBROATHStorageAccepted to connect52.68
BUCKIES FARMSSENTHURSO SOUTH GRIDStorageAccepted to connect52.68
Hall FarmUKPNBramfordSolarAccepted to connect49.4
MORENISHSSENKILLINStorageAccepted to connect49.4
RYCOTE FARMSSENCOWLEY GSPSolarAccepted to connect47.5
DORMANSTEADS PCENWLHARKER ENWL SGTS 1 2 3A 4 / HUTTON GSP GROUPSolarAccepted to connect40
(ANM) Bardwell Fields FarmUKPNBramfordSolarAccepted to connect29.63

Grid supply points

Each grid supply point its sites are at, with the capacity of its own sites there.

Grid supply pointDNOSitesConnectedAccepted to connect
BramfordUKPN6–188 MW
Cellarhead 132KvNGED1–54 MW
ABERNETHYSSEN1–52.7 MW
ARBROATHSSEN1–52.7 MW
BRORASSEN1–52.7 MW
THURSO SOUTH GRIDSSEN1–52.7 MW
KILLINSSEN1–49.4 MW
COWLEY GSPSSEN1–47.5 MW
HARKER ENWL SGTS 1 2 3A 4 / HUTTON GSP GROUPENWL1–40 MW
NorwichUKPN1–20 MW

What changed recently

Changes to its sites found in both of two consecutive monthly editions of their DNO's register, the latest first.

UKPN, September 2026 edition to October 2026 edition, for this customer's sites: 8 sites matched. Every September site and every October site had a match in the other edition.

NGED: QueueWatch holds one edition of its register so far, the August 2026 edition, so there is nothing to compare yet.

SSEN, August 2026 edition to September 2026 edition, for this customer's sites: 6 sites matched. Every August site and every September site had a match in the other edition.

ENWL, May 2026 edition to September 2026 edition, for this customer's sites: 1 site matched. Every May site and every September site had a match in the other edition.

No change to the status, capacity, technology or customer of its sites in the editions QueueWatch holds.

QueueQuant

Price what a delay would do to your project

QueueWatch reports what changed in the DNOs' published connection registers. It doesn't tell you what to do about it. That's what QueueQuant is for.

Give QueueQuant a site and it compares every way you could power it, on the grid or off it: waiting for the firm date, taking a non-firm offer, building a private wire or going off-grid, across every combination of contracted capacity, generation and battery. That’s millions of possible plans, each tested against thousands of possible futures for delay, curtailment and price. It returns the one plan that holds up best, even when that plan is not to build.

Price my project

Get the plan that holds up best for your site, and where that answer flips.

What you get from QueueQuant

  • The route to power that wins
  • How to size every asset on the site
  • The level of delay or curtailment at which that answer flips
  • Whether the project is worth building at all
  • How bad the worst outcomes get, at the risk level you choose