Changes of customer in the transmission queue
NESO calls the company that holds a project’s connection agreement its customer, and its TEC register names it. This page follows every change of customer in the register since January 2021: how often, which projects and to whom, how many came before the project connected, and how those projects fared against similar projects. It shows transfers of the agreement and renamings, not sales of the company that holds it. The figures on this page update with each new register.
Who this page helps, and how
Investors and buyers. See which companies are taking on connection agreements, and whether projects that changed hands kept their connection dates as well as the rest.
Developers selling a project. Show buyers how projects that changed hands fared, and price the sale with our analysis of whether to sell now or wait for a Gate 2 offer.
Landowners. Look up your site to see who holds its connection agreement now.
DESNZ and Ofgem. Under the Data Centre Covenant, the government plans to move pre-2030 data centre connection contracts to strategic sites. This page shows how often agreements already change hands.
1. How often does the customer change?
Since January 2021, NESO’s TEC register has changed a project’s customer 1,072 times. A later register undid 127 of those, putting the old name back, and we take out both the change and the one that undid it, 254 changes in all, which leaves 818. 266 named another company. 546 may still be the same owner: the two names share a name or begin alike, both carry the project’s own name or the same number, the agreement moved into a company named after the project, or the same change came on several projects at once. 6 were the same company renamed.
In 2025, 5.2% of the projects in the queue at the start of the year changed to another company, 16.7% including those that may be the same owner.
Changes of customer by year
Each change in the year its register first shows the new name. Press a bar to list the changes, with what each name was changed from and to.
* 2026 to 3 November 2026.
| Year | Changes | Another company | May be the same owner | The same company renamed | Queue at the start of the year that changed to another company | Including those that may be the same owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 40 | 10 | 30 | 0 | 2.1% | 7.1% |
| 2022 | 41 | 7 | 33 | 1 | 1.1% | 5.2% |
| 2023 | 102 | 42 | 60 | 0 | 3.0% | 8.4% |
| 2024 | 193 | 53 | 137 | 3 | 3.5% | 12.1% |
| 2025 | 297 | 93 | 203 | 1 | 5.2% | 16.7% |
| 2026 so far | 145 | 61 | 83 | 1 | 3.2% | 7.7% |
How we measured it
A change of customer is a project’s customer name in one register different from the last one given before it, capitals, spaces and punctuation aside; a blank is never a change. A change that a later register undoes, the old name back, is taken out with the change that undid it. Two names are the same company where they differ only in a legal form or in “&” for “and”, or where an approved alias joins them, and a pair can be put right in those aliases later. The register names the company that holds the agreement, so a sale of that company leaves its name as it was: these are transfers of the agreement and renamings, not every sale of a project.
2. Which projects changed customer, and to whom?
Most changes came at an early stage: 632 of the 812 changes to another company, or one that may be the same owner, came while the project was at Scoping, and 367 were storage projects.
| Technology | Another company | May be the same owner | The same company renamed | MW still to connect at the change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Storage | 129 | 238 | 2 | 109,026 |
| Solar | 9 | 14 | 0 | 6,805 |
| Onshore wind | 25 | 47 | 1 | 5,362 |
| Offshore wind | 15 | 54 | 2 | 84,543 |
| Thermal | 9 | 23 | 0 | 29,879 |
| Hybrid | 71 | 151 | 1 | 96,185 |
| Other | 8 | 19 | 0 | 13,937 |
| Company | From another company | Including from one that may be the same owner | MW still to connect |
|---|---|---|---|
| RWE Renewables UK Solar and Storage Limited | 4 | 5 | 1,860 |
| LITTLETON PASTURES SOLAR LIMITED | 3 | 3 | 1,150 |
| Virmati Energy Ltd | 3 | 3 | 1,000 |
| Galileo Empower UK Limited | 3 | 3 | 255 |
| PD688IRO LTD | 3 | 3 | 143 |
| RWE Generation UK Plc | 2 | 3 | 1,406 |
| Onpath Energy Limited | 2 | 2 | 2,800 |
| Berwick Bank B Limited | 2 | 2 | 2,300 |
| HECATE INDEPENDENT POWER LIMITED | 2 | 2 | 2,000 |
| Old Rides Energy Storage Limited | 2 | 2 | 2,000 |
| SOUTH KENT ENERGY PARK LIMITED | 2 | 2 | 1,000 |
| DALIA HOLDINGS LTD | 2 | 2 | 756 |
| JBM SOLAR LIMITED | 2 | 2 | 756 |
| BLACKFORD RENEWABLES LTD | 2 | 2 | 550 |
| YORK ENERGY PARK LIMITED | 2 | 2 | 500 |
How we measured it
A company is its name as the register writes it most recently, taking together names that differ only in a legal form or in “&” for “and”, or that an approved alias joins. Each change counts once, in the technology and status the project had in the register that first showed the new name, with the MW it still had to connect there.
3. How often does the customer change before a project connects?
Of the 2,000 projects with MW to connect in a register since January 2021, 239 (12.0%) changed to another company while still to connect, 661 (33.1%) including those that may be the same owner. Of the 105 projects that connected a stage, as the register first shows it, 3 had changed to another company before it, 21 including those that may be the same owner.
How we measured it
A change counts as before the project connected where it still had MW to connect in the register before the change. A stage has connected when the register first shows its MW connected.
4. How did they fare against similar projects?
We compare each project whose customer changed in a year with similar projects in the rest of the queue: the same year, the same distance to its connection date, and the same status. Over the full years from 2021 to 2025, 17% of the projects that changed to another company were pushed back within the year, against 15% for similar projects; including those that may be the same owner, 18%, against 17%.
About as many have left the queue since their change as we’d expect: 5 of those that changed to another company, against 4.5 expected, and 13 including those that may be the same owner, against 14.9.
| Projects that changed customer | Compared | Pushed back in the year | Left since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Another company | 146 | 25 (21.9) | 5 (4.5) |
| Including those that may be the same owner | 494 | 91 (82.3) | 13 (14.9) |
What it means: A change of customer says little about whether a project’s connection date will move.
How we measured it
For each full year we take the projects with MW to connect and a connection date at the start and the end of the year, as Delays and exits does. A project is similar to another where both are in the same year, their connection dates were the same distance ahead at the start of it (due that year, the year after, two years on, three or four, five or more, or past already) and both had the same status. What is expected is how often the rest of the queue in the same group was pushed back, left or connected, added up over the projects that changed customer. Where they are now is read from the latest register; we give how many have connected since only where it differs from the number expected by more than 15%.
Sell now, or wait for your Gate 2 offer?
QueueQuant values your project across thousands of possible futures for its connection date and the market. Our use case asks whether to sell a battery project now or wait for its Gate 2 offer, once the risk is allowed for.
How to cite this page
You’re welcome to quote our figures, charts and findings with this credit:
QueueWatch by QueueQuant, ‘Changes of customer in the transmission queue’, queuequant.com/queuewatch/changes-of-customer/ (data to 3 November 2026). Contains data from NESO’s TEC register. Supported by National Energy SO Open Data.
Supported by National Energy SO Open Data. Registers from 29 January 2021 to 11 August 2026 are copies NESO released to QueueQuant on 19 October 2026 under the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (request FOI/26/226). Later registers are QueueWatch’s own downloads from NESO’s Data Portal.