VIKING ENERGY WIND FARM LLP
Customer named in the TEC register
Projects
| Project | Connection site | Technology | Queued MW | Connection date | Gate | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viking Wind Farm | Kergord GSP | Onshore wind | 0 | Connected | Not stated | Built |
Recent changes
- Viking Wind FarmNorth Scotland, Onshore wind9 MW no longer connected
- Viking Wind FarmNorth Scotland, Onshore wind443 MW now connectedConnected
- Viking Wind FarmNorth Scotland, Onshore windStatus changed from Consents Approved to Built
- Viking Wind FarmNorth Scotland, Onshore windSubstation name updated in the register (from Kergord to Kergord GSP)
- Viking Wind FarmNorth Scotland, Onshore windConnection date moved from 1 Apr 2024 to 1 Jul 2024 (+3 months)+3 mo
- Viking Wind FarmNorth Scotland, Onshore windCapacity changed from 457 MW to 443 MW
- Viking Wind FarmNorth Scotland, Onshore windConnection date moved from 4 Jan 2024 to 1 Apr 2024 (+3 months)+3 mo
Price what a delay would do to your project
QueueWatch reports what changed in the public TEC register. It doesn’t tell you what to do about it. That’s what QueueQuant is for.
Give QueueQuant a site and it compares every way you could power it, on the grid or off it: waiting for the firm date, taking a non-firm offer, building a private wire or going off-grid, across every combination of contracted capacity, generation and battery. That’s millions of possible plans, each tested against thousands of possible futures for delay, curtailment and price. It returns the one plan that holds up best, even when that plan is not to build.
Get the plan that holds up best for your site, and where that answer flips.
What you get from QueueQuant
- The route to power that wins
- How to size every asset on the site
- The level of delay or curtailment at which that answer flips
- Whether the project is worth building at all
- How bad the worst outcomes get, at the risk level you choose
See how we’d price it: Sell now, or wait for your Gate 2 offer?