SSE RENEWABLES WIND FARMS (UK) LIMITED
Customer named in the TEC register
Projects
| Project | Connection site | Technology | Queued MW | Connection date | Gate | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hadyard Hill | Maybole 132/33kV | Onshore wind | 0 | Connected | Not stated | Built |
Recent changes
- Hadyard HillSouth Scotland, Onshore windSubstation name updated in the register (from Maybole 132/33KV Substation to Maybole 132/33kV)
- Hadyard HillSouth Scotland, Onshore windSubstation name updated in the register (from Maybole 132/33KV to Maybole 132/33KV Substation)
- Hadyard HillSouth Scotland, Onshore windCustomer changed from SSE GENERATION LIMITED to SSE RENEWABLES WIND FARMS (UK) LIMITED
- Hadyard HillSouth Scotland, Onshore windCustomer changed from SSE RENEWABLES WIND FARMS (UK) LIMITED to SSE GENERATION LIMITED
- Hadyard HillSouth Scotland, Onshore windCustomer changed from SSE GENERATION LIMITED to SSE RENEWABLES WIND FARMS (UK) LIMITED
Price what a delay would do to your project
QueueWatch reports what changed in the public TEC register. It doesn’t tell you what to do about it. That’s what QueueQuant is for.
Give QueueQuant a site and it compares every way you could power it, on the grid or off it: waiting for the firm date, taking a non-firm offer, building a private wire or going off-grid, across every combination of contracted capacity, generation and battery. That’s millions of possible plans, each tested against thousands of possible futures for delay, curtailment and price. It returns the one plan that holds up best, even when that plan is not to build.
Get the plan that holds up best for your site, and where that answer flips.
What you get from QueueQuant
- The route to power that wins
- How to size every asset on the site
- The level of delay or curtailment at which that answer flips
- Whether the project is worth building at all
- How bad the worst outcomes get, at the risk level you choose
See how we’d price it: Sell now, or wait for your Gate 2 offer?