Redshaw Energy Park Developments LLP
Customer named in the TEC register
Projects
| Project | Connection site | Technology | Queued MW | Connection date | Gate | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redshaw Energy Park | Redshaw Energy Park 132kV substation | Storage | 500 | 30 Oct 2031 | Gate 1 | Scoping |
Recent changes
- Redshaw Energy ParkSouth Scotland, StorageConnection point changed from Linnmill 132/33kV to Redshaw Energy Park 132kV substation
- Redshaw Energy ParkSouth Scotland, StorageMarked as Gate 1
- Redshaw Energy ParkSouth Scotland, StorageCustomer changed from BAYWA R.E. UK LIMITED to Redshaw Energy Park Developments LLP
- Redshaw Energy ParkSouth Scotland, StorageConnection point changed from Linmill 132/33kV to Linnmill 132/33kV
- Redshaw Energy ParkSouth Scotland, StorageSubstation name updated in the register (from Linmill 132/33kV Substation to Linmill 132/33kV)
- Redshaw Energy ParkSouth Scotland, StorageAdded to the registerNew
Price what a delay would do to your project
QueueWatch reports what changed in the public TEC register. It doesn’t tell you what to do about it. That’s what QueueQuant is for.
Give QueueQuant a site and it compares every way you could power it, on the grid or off it: waiting for the firm date, taking a non-firm offer, building a private wire or going off-grid, across every combination of contracted capacity, generation and battery. That’s millions of possible plans, each tested against thousands of possible futures for delay, curtailment and price. It returns the one plan that holds up best, even when that plan is not to build.
Get the plan that holds up best for your site, and where that answer flips.
What you get from QueueQuant
- The route to power that wins
- How to size every asset on the site
- The level of delay or curtailment at which that answer flips
- Whether the project is worth building at all
- How bad the worst outcomes get, at the risk level you choose
See how we’d price it: Sell now, or wait for your Gate 2 offer?